- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:51:27 -0500
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- CC: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> Sounds like casting the soap-c14n spec as a transform is the best bet, > I'll modify it accordingly. No, I disagree. If you make it a URI then it is easy for XSLT folks to recognize that URI and call the built-in transform. It is also easy for code-based folks to call their built-in subroutine. If you make it a transform, then both folks will have to do some serious work (e.g., canonicalize!) the transform to see if it's the special-case applies. The simplest thing for all implementors is URI with non-normative transform as an appendix. /r$
Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 13:51:28 UTC