W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Problem in exclusive canonicalization? encoding underspecified

From: Carl Ellison <cme@jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:58:05 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20030630115805.0223d3b8@mailbox.jf.intel.com>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, reagle@w3.org, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 12:47 PM 6/30/2003 -0400, Martin Duerst wrote:
>
>I just have had a look at
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718, and found
>two problems, one of them i18n-related.
>
>
>1) encoding underspecified?
>
>The exclusive canonical form of a document subset is a physical 
>representation of the XPath node-set, as an octet sequence, produced
>by the  method described in this specification.
>
>This does not at all say what the encoding is. Is this UTF-8? If
>yes, where is this specified? If no, what is the encoding? Is the
>reader
>supposed to go check elsewhere?

Doesn't exc-C14N inherit UTF-8 encoding from the C14N spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1

iQA/AwUBPwCIPcxqBGb+WvJAEQKfHACeP7EYc8lW7ZfF+YvwNAgiWdgrGi0An2tY
dmysYaJrnM2CIFe7+pdNOa9p
=TqlR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl Ellison      Intel R & D       E: cme@jf.intel.com |
|2111 NE 25th Ave                    T: +1-503-264-2900  |
|Hillsboro OR 97124                  F: +1-503-264-3375  |
|PGP Key ID: 0xFE5AF240                                  |
|  1FDB 2770 08D7 8540 E157  AAB4 CC6A 0466 FE5A F240    |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 15:01:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:17 GMT