Re: Problem in exclusive canonicalization? encoding underspecified

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 12:47 PM 6/30/2003 -0400, Martin Duerst wrote:
>
>I just have had a look at
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718, and found
>two problems, one of them i18n-related.
>
>
>1) encoding underspecified?
>
>The exclusive canonical form of a document subset is a physical 
>representation of the XPath node-set, as an octet sequence, produced
>by the  method described in this specification.
>
>This does not at all say what the encoding is. Is this UTF-8? If
>yes, where is this specified? If no, what is the encoding? Is the
>reader
>supposed to go check elsewhere?

Doesn't exc-C14N inherit UTF-8 encoding from the C14N spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1

iQA/AwUBPwCIPcxqBGb+WvJAEQKfHACeP7EYc8lW7ZfF+YvwNAgiWdgrGi0An2tY
dmysYaJrnM2CIFe7+pdNOa9p
=TqlR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl Ellison      Intel R & D       E: cme@jf.intel.com |
|2111 NE 25th Ave                    T: +1-503-264-2900  |
|Hillsboro OR 97124                  F: +1-503-264-3375  |
|PGP Key ID: 0xFE5AF240                                  |
|  1FDB 2770 08D7 8540 E157  AAB4 CC6A 0466 FE5A F240    |
+--------------------------------------------------------+