> > > My gut tells me that XML Signature is really best suited for those automated > > transactions in which there is a well defined "contract" defined by the XML > > (via XML Schema, no doubt) with well known parties sending the transactions. > > For example, an order entry system that generates fixed transations within a > > group of customers/suppliers/manufacturers. > > Web services: loosely coupled, tightly contracted. > Agree from the architectural standpoint, but not so "tightly contracted" from the operational point of view until we have an unified standard for the "Inter-business Process Collaboration", a.k.a., "choreography", "orchestration" or "conversation." PaeReceived on Saturday, 14 December 2002 20:21:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT