Ok. I'll make the proposed errata (of CDATA/xsd:string) as "stable". On Friday 06 December 2002 12:42 pm, John Boyer wrote: > A secondary motivation is that, while I don't see a really good reason > for being more precise, a fairly lengthy amount of implementation > experience has shown me that the decision to be less precise often has a > way of coming back to provide some really painful experiences. Still, in > this case, the fact that we are somewhat constrained by people who have > only DTD and not schema provides some reasonable justification for not > going that extra mile. Consistency would be another reason (i.e. if such > a level of precision does not match what was done everywhere else in the > DSig related products, then it's probably not a good idea to introduce > that in this one case).Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 12:57:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT