Nathn, In general, whether or not you apply canonicalization depends on the type of URI and the transforms. Assuming no explicit transforms, if the URI="" or URI="#foo" where foo is arbitrary, then you will use canonicalization to create a canonical physical representation of the referenced resource. If the URI is NOT URI="" or URI="#foo", then no canonicalization occurs, the resource is treated as octets. That is, unless there is an explicit transform that requires the resource be interpreted as a node-set. Regards, Blake Dournaee Senior Systems Engineer RSA Security, Inc. 650-295-7548 "A mind all logic is like a knife all blade, it makes the hand bleed that uses it." -----Original Message----- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann [mailto:geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:36 AM To: ???(Nathan Wu); w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subject: Re: Need to C14N a reference before computing the digest ?? --On Freitag, 23. August 2002 18:02 +0800 <nathan.wu@email.chinatrust.com.tw> wrote: > Do we need to C14N a reference before computing the digest ?? If you have a node set and you do not "manually" c14n by an explicit transform, the default c14n is applied which is (inclusive) c14n omitting comments. ChristianReceived on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 20:10:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT