W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: Comments on XPath Filter 2.0 draft (2002-06-20)

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:56:10 -0400
To: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Cc: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200207091456.10765.reagle@w3.org>

On Monday 08 July 2002 01:59 pm, John Boyer wrote:
> The point I will concede is that the statement "iterate through the input
> document in document order" seems unnecessary.  The declarative style
> would simply be to say "Process each node in the document, adding each
> node to the filter node-set..." .  

I've tweaked the text in [1] to the declarative stance. As I'm also prepping 
the spec for publication I've moved all the "node set" to "node-set" and 
updated the References, if anyone thinks this is not insufficient (or folks 
want pseudo-code) please say so ASAP. (The Last Call ends on this Thursday 
and I will publish a new version next week, the question is should be it a 
Candidate REC (and give it another 3 weeks in that stage if we expect other 
implementations) or Proposed REC (save ourselves a little time)).

[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-filter2/
$Revision: 1.18 $ on $Date: 2002/07/09 18:51:51 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 14:56:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT