- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:56:10 -0400
- To: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Cc: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
On Monday 08 July 2002 01:59 pm, John Boyer wrote: > The point I will concede is that the statement "iterate through the input > document in document order" seems unnecessary. The declarative style > would simply be to say "Process each node in the document, adding each > node to the filter node-set..." . I've tweaked the text in [1] to the declarative stance. As I'm also prepping the spec for publication I've moved all the "node set" to "node-set" and updated the References, if anyone thinks this is not insufficient (or folks want pseudo-code) please say so ASAP. (The Last Call ends on this Thursday and I will publish a new version next week, the question is should be it a Candidate REC (and give it another 3 weeks in that stage if we expect other implementations) or Proposed REC (save ourselves a little time)). [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-filter2/ $Revision: 1.18 $ on $Date: 2002/07/09 18:51:51 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 14:56:22 UTC