W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Last call announcement for XML 1.1

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:37:54 -0400
To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Cc: "'xml-encryption@w3.org'" <xml-encryption@w3.org>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20020619143754.D9FFE85EBF@aeon.w3.org>


I missed the earlier announce I suppose, but I'm cc:ing this call to the 
xmldsig and xenc lists. Both of those specs are dependent on XML1.0 and I 
haven't considered the 1.1 spec closely enough to understand if xmldsig and 
xenc could also work with 1.1 . I hope to think about it more carefully and 
that others in the WG will do the same! <smile/>

On Wednesday 19 June 2002 10:06 am, Paul Grosso wrote:
> Chairs, especially those of the following WGs:
>
>     I18N
>     DOM
>     XSL
>     XML Protocol
>     XML Query
>     XML Schema
>     XML Signature
>
> The XML 1.1 Last Call period ends in a little over a week.
>
> Please let us know if you will be sending in a review
> by June 28th.
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul Grosso, Arnaud Le Hors
> Co-chairs, XML Core WG
>
> At 08:33 2002 04 29 -0500, Paul Grosso wrote:
> >This is the last call announcement for XML 1.1
> >http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xml11-20020425/
> >aka http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/
> >
> >Abstract
> >--------
> >This document describes XML 1.1, a deliverable of the
> >XML Core Working Group as defined in the XML Blueberry
> >Requirements. XML 1.1 was formerly known as XML Blueberry.
> >This document takes the form of a series of alterations
> >to the XML 1.0 Recommendation [XML1.0], and its numbered
> >sections correspond to those of the XML 1.0 Recommendation.
> >Sections of that Recommendation that do not appear in this
> >document remain unchanged in XML 1.1.
> >
> >Status of this Document
> >-----------------------
> >This section describes the status of this document at the
> >time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this
> >document. The latest status of this document series is maintained
> >at the W3C.
> >
> >This is a Last Call Working Draft of the XML Core Working
> >Group (member only), for review by W3C members and
> >other interested parties. This document has been produced
> >as part of the XML Activity, and may eventually be
> >advanced toward W3C Recommendation status.
> >
> >Being a Working Draft document, this specification may be
> >updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
> >time. The test cases described and referred to in this
> >document may also be updated, replaced or obsoleted at an any
> >time. It is therefore inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts
> >as reference material or to cite them as other than "work
> >in progress". A list of current W3C working drafts can be
> >found at http://www.w3.org/TR/ .
> >
> >This draft document will be considered by the W3C and its
> >members according to W3C process. This document is
> >made public for the purpose of receiving comments that
> >inform the W3C membership and staff on issues likely to affect
> >the implementation, acceptance, and adoption of XML 1.1.
> >
> >While this and subsequent drafts of this specification will
> >be written as a series of alterations to the XML 1.0
> >Recommendation to facilitate editing and review, it is likely
> >that the final XML 1.1 Recommendation will take the form of
> >an integral revision of the XML 1.0 specification.
> >
> >We explicitly invite comments on this draft. The Last Call
> >review period ends at 2359Z on 28 June 2002.  Comments
> >should be sent to www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org . This
> >is the preferred method of providing feedback. Public
> >comments and their responses can be accessed at
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-blueberry-comments/ .
> >
> >Other notices
> >-------------
> >The XML Core WG makes a special feedback request on the issue
> >of Normalization checking in XML 1.1.  Among other things, the
> >decision to mandate that XML 1.1 processors do normalization
> >checking means that some potential (though probably rare in
> >practice) well-formed XML 1.0 documents would not be XML 1.1
> >documents.
> >
> >The XML Core WG also notes a minority opinion at
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2002AprJun/0037
> >supporting the addition of 0x1-0x1F to the allowed range of characters
> >in XML documents and accordingly makes a special feedback request
> >on this issue.
> >
> >The following are the working groups that are especially invited
> >to review the draft:
> >
> >    I18N
> >    DOM
> >    XSL
> >    XML Protocol
> >    XML Query
> >    XML Schema
> >    XML Signature
> >
> >The decision to go to last call is minuted at:
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-core-wg/2002AprJun/0078
> >
> >Paul Grosso, Arnaud Le Hors
> >Co-chairs, XML Core WG

-- 

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 10:38:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT