On Tuesday 11 June 2002 03:33 pm, merlin wrote: > sign-xfdl.xml is still in there; there are two signature > documents; the XFDL one and the spec one; the spec one > also includes a test of an empty input node set. Ah, good. So we now link to this new tar ball (Y1) and need new interop reports over it (the old one's have been removed). -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 16:11:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT