W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: POLL: Fwd: Re: XPath filter 2.0

From: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:34:43 -0700
Message-ID: <7874BFCCD289A645B5CE3935769F0B52328815@tigger.PureEdge.com>
To: <reagle@w3.org>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

Hi Joseph,

The interop examples, including the one for XFDL, need only be reworked.  Is there some reason to delete any of them?

Also, the syntax in 3.2 and the examples in Section 4 will have to be changed, right?

Thanks,
John Boyer

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:11 AM
To: merlin
Cc: John Boyer; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subject: Re: POLL: Fwd: Re: XPath filter 2.0


On Monday 10 June 2002 11:33 pm, merlin wrote:
> Attached is, probably not as clear as it could be, my
> alternative proposal in more explicit language, along with
> interop samples.

Awesome Merlin! I've placed it at:
  http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-filter2/Overview.html
(Contains a *few* editorial tweaks (e.g., adding an XPointer reference) but 
otherwise made good sense on a quick read through.)

I'm happy to update the interop matrix but I then need to remove the 
present sets and reports; I'm sad to loose the sign-xfdl.xml example for 
the performance profile, so a new version of that would be useful. 


[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/05/xmldsig-filter2-interop.html
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 14:36:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT