W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Y5 Exclusive C145n interop; was Re: c14n/exc-c14n interop samples

From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 17:35:36 +0100
To: reagle@w3.org
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020605163536.2A1A74432D@yog-sothoth.ie.baltimore.com>

r/reagle@w3.org/2002.06.05/12:32:43
>On Wednesday 05 June 2002 12:23 pm, merlin wrote:
>> Agreed, things are much more clear. 3, 4.3.3,
>
>Try a refresh. I don't see a 3, 4.3.3, and 4.3 is about xmlns="" not 
>namespace node prefixes...

Meant to say 3, 3.3: 
  3. ...
    3. it has not yet been rendered by any output ancestor, or the
       nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly utilizes
       the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set with the a
       different namespace prefix and value as N.

>>   "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>>    utilizes the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set
>>    with the a different namespace prefix and value as N."
>>
>> This doesnt't quite capture it. Either:
>>   "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>>    utilizes the namespace prefix does not have a namespace node in
>>    the node-set with the same prefix and value as N."
>> Or:
>>   "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>>    utilizes the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set
>>    with the same prefix and a different value than N, or has no
>>    namespace node in the node set with the same prefix as N."
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 12:36:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:16 GMT