Hi Aleksey, I would agree on that, but since two weeks, my understanding of c14n is a little bit puzzled ;-)) Christian --On Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2002 22:24 -0700 Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com> wrote: > > Hi, Merlin! > > I have a question regarding your examples. You've canonicalized the second > reference as follows (c14n-1.txt): > > <bar:Something xmlns:bar="http://example.org/bar" xml:lang="en-ie"> > <foo:Something xmlns:foo="http://example.org/foo"> > <bar:Something xmlns:bar="http://example.org/bar"> > <foo:Something xmlns:foo="http://example.org/foo"> > <baz:Something > xmlns:baz="http://example.org/baz"></baz:Something> > </foo:Something> > </bar:Something> > </foo:Something> > </bar:Something> > > and it seems to me that according to > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n#SuperfluousNSDecl the correct c14n form is > the following (unnecessary namespace declarations are removed): > > <bar:Something xmlns:bar="http://example.org/bar" xml:lang="en-ie"> > <foo:Something xmlns:foo="http://example.org/foo"> > <bar:Something> > <foo:Something> > <baz:Something > xmlns:baz="http://example.org/baz"></baz:Something> > </foo:Something> > </bar:Something> > </foo:Something> > </bar:Something> > > > With best regards, > > Aleksey SaninReceived on Friday, 31 May 2002 02:46:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT