On Monday 27 May 2002 11:29 am, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: > Well, the main difference between inclusive and exclusive c14n is that in > inclusive c14n, I can simply output the changes to the inscope namespace > decls. In exclusive c14n, I also have to check whether a namespace is > visibly utilized. That's the additional overhead. But I have to reduce > this 1.3-1.6 to a lower level of 1.1-1.2. Yes, so that should mean for every element one tests to see if the node.prefix or any of the attributes prefixes are the same as the namespace prefix avaible in its axis. I haven't dug deeply but in the small tests I can do, this is a neglible difference in performance (and for other reasons, exc-c14n tends to be slight faster as the size of the document grows.) However, I'll also say I'm not expert at this...Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 16:24:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT