W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Relative NS if Exclusive C14n?

From: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:00:07 -0700
Message-ID: <3CED1207.8020207@aleksey.com>
To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
CC: jboyer@PureEdge.com, reagle@w3.org, Donald.Eastlake@Motorola.com, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Yes, it is. There is a protocol ('foo') and the "path" ('bar').

Aleksey.

Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> short question about the examples in the "Exclusive XML 
> Canonicalization" PR:
>
>
> The section "2.2 General Problems with re-Enveloping" contains this babe:
>
>   xmlns:n0="foo:bar"
>
> My question is:
>
>   Is this a relative namespace?
>
> xmlns:n0="urn:foo" is not, but the above?
>
>
> Christian
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 12:02:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT