There were no replies to my suggestion [1] about an option to process nodes instead of subtrees in XPath Filter 2.0 Transform so I am rasing this question again. I understand the performance concerns (and I do see small performance decrease in my tests).However, I believe this will add flexibility and provide better way to select "complicated" parts of XML document. Aleksey Sanin. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002AprJun/0040.html Joseph Reagle wrote: > >3. XPath Filter 2.0 Transform > >Thanks to this week's edits by Merlin (and discussion between Merlin, John, >Aleksey, and Christian) I think we've converged on a design and text that >we're happy with. If no one objects to the present text [2] (speak now!) >I'll stage it for publication as a W3C Last Call Working Draft (and first >"official" W3C WD) at the end of this month. >Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 18:25:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT