Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml

>OTH, XSLT 1.0 will probably be used still for a while and it seems like
>a good idea to be compliant with it as it stands today, or I have missed
>something else?

Processing efficiency.

We all agree that Xalan has a known divergence at this time. Count it as a
bug if you like. We don't yet have a cure for this one which isn't worse
than the disease. If you've got a brilliant solution, feel free to
contribute a proposed fix; Xalan is open-source.

Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 14:26:46 UTC