W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml

From: <Joseph_Kesselman@lotus.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:21:55 -0500
To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Cc: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>, Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com>, XML Signature WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF5F8A7CBC.BA7E9578-ON85256B10.00698A37@lotus.com>

>OTH, XSLT 1.0 will probably be used still for a while and it seems like
>a good idea to be compliant with it as it stands today, or I have missed
>something else?

Processing efficiency.

We all agree that Xalan has a known divergence at this time. Count it as a
bug if you like. We don't yet have a cure for this one which isn't worse
than the disease. If you've got a brilliant solution, feel free to
contribute a proposed fix; Xalan is open-source.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 14:26:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT