I accidently ommitted the response from Thomas Maslen DSTC (one of the implementors in the matrix) from my informal tally: Maslen: option 2 required preferred http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0297.html >Boyer: option 2 with many caveats > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0304.html >Geuer-Pollmann: I vote for option 2 - Recommended. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0299.html >Mark Bartel: option 2 and REQUIRED. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0303.html >Brian LaMacchia: option 1 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0310.html >Gregor Karlinger: option 1 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0311.html -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 22:20:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT