- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:15:42 -0400
- To: "Donald Eastlake" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
- Cc: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I accidently ommitted the response from Thomas Maslen DSTC (one of the
implementors in the matrix) from my informal tally:
Maslen: option 2 required preferred
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0297.html
>Boyer: option 2 with many caveats
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0304.html
>Geuer-Pollmann: I vote for option 2 - Recommended.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0299.html
>Mark Bartel: option 2 and REQUIRED.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0303.html
>Brian LaMacchia: option 1
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0310.html
>Gregor Karlinger: option 1
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2001AprJun/0311.html
--
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 22:20:02 UTC