RE: Proposal: Text for signature portability / C14N / inherited namespaces, etc.

At 07:44 6/9/2001, Gregor Karlinger wrote:
>1. I think the second issues mentioned by Donald,
>   is still not covered by the current text.

Based on Donald's last email, I tweaked the examples as he suggested (though 
using element C so as to be consistent).

>2. Shouldn't it be a choice between steps (1) and (2) in the text? Currently
>    it reads as if both steps (1) and (2) must be applied.

Ok, added an "either .... or ..."

[
         $Revision: 1.79 $ on $Date: 2001/06/12 20:29:04 $
         http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-NamespaceContext
]


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 16:33:40 UTC