W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: KeyName white space

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:44:48 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010530124441.00ba2838@localhost>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
[Resulting document:
   http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html
   $Revision: 1.60 $ on $Date: 2001/05/22 16:44:16 $

   4.4.1 The KeyName Element
   The KeyName element contains a string value (in which white space
   is significant) which may be used ...
]

At 00:49 5/22/2001 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:

>My conclusion is that there isn't a strong enough opinion to change
>the provisions of the current standard which have been incorporated
>into existing implementations.  However, we should include text in the
>next revision which clearly says that KeyName is not a name in the
>sense of a token token but a string in which white space IS
>significant.
>
>Donald, as co-Chair


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 12:45:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT