W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: KeyName white space

From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 22:18:11 +0100
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-Id: <20010514211811.61E1343C15@yog-sothoth.ie.baltimore.com>

Agreed. DNames already have this property (from RFC 2253 I think),
and I believe so do base-64 coded data as well as integers, so
this would unify pretty much all of our text handling.

merlin

r/dee3@torque.pothole.com/2001.05.14/14:35:23
>Hi,
>
>Some questions have arisen about in the XML Encryption activity the
>handling of white space in the content of the KeyName element. There
>was substantial feeling there that leading and trailing whitespace
>should be stripped from KeyName content.  I think this would be an
>improvement but since it is in the XMLDSIG namespace, this list is
>the right place for discussion.  What do others think?
>
>Thanks,
>Donald
>=====================================================================
> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                      dee3@torque.pothole.com
> 155 Beaver Street                                +1 508-634-2066(h)
> Milford, MA 01757 USA                            +1 508-261-5434(w)
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct,  special,  indirect 
or consequential  damages  arising  from  alteration of  the contents of this
message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on.

In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to
promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or
appearance at trade shows and conferences.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.
   http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Monday, 14 May 2001 17:19:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT