W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Erratum in section 1.1 of Canonical XML

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 21:17:14 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
Cc: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 17:22 5/9/2001 -0700, John Boyer wrote:
>So, over to you, Joseph.  What is the W3C position on this?  As far as I'm 
>concerned, it's a really trivial point and a really trivial process to omit 
>'(DTD)' in the two locations specified, so whatever the W3C wants to do 
>(file or not file an erratum) is fine by me.

Hi John, I'll look into this. However, which part of XPath leads you to 
your  interpretation? My quick scan of "DTD" leads to me believe it means 
definition (particularly as it's commonly used as "external DTD" in XPath).

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 21:17:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:35 UTC