- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 21:17:14 -0400
- To: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Cc: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 17:22 5/9/2001 -0700, John Boyer wrote: >So, over to you, Joseph. What is the W3C position on this? As far as I'm >concerned, it's a really trivial point and a really trivial process to omit >'(DTD)' in the two locations specified, so whatever the W3C wants to do >(file or not file an erratum) is fine by me. Hi John, I'll look into this. However, which part of XPath leads you to your interpretation? My quick scan of "DTD" leads to me believe it means definition (particularly as it's commonly used as "external DTD" in XPath). __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 21:17:55 UTC