W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: TALLY and New POLL: Fwd: Proposal RE: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:15:40 -0400
Message-Id: <200009281615.MAA04165@torque.pothole.com>
To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I believe there is now a clear consensus for this proposal which I also


From:  "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Message-Id:  <>
Date:  Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:32:00 -0400
To:  "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

>[to be clear, this proposal resulting from the analysis of:
>         http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0521.html
>         go with Choice #1 as it is specified above, i.e. REQUIRE
>         implementers to A) not use Type 1 processors, B) generate
>         errors if Type 2 processor used and non-absolute namespace
>         URI found, or C) use a Type 3 processor.
>         [2,c]
>please express your acceptance of this proposal or opposition (and reason 
>why) by Wednesday October 27th.
>Joseph Reagle Jr.
>W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
>IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2000 12:12:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:34 UTC