- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:15:40 -0400
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I believe there is now a clear consensus for this proposal which I also support. Donald From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000922163058.035bfe88@rpcp.mit.edu> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:32:00 -0400 To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> >[to be clear, this proposal resulting from the analysis of: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0521.html >] >__ > > go with Choice #1 as it is specified above, i.e. REQUIRE > implementers to A) not use Type 1 processors, B) generate > errors if Type 2 processor used and non-absolute namespace > URI found, or C) use a Type 3 processor. > [2,c] > >please express your acceptance of this proposal or opposition (and reason >why) by Wednesday October 27th. > >__ >Joseph Reagle Jr. >W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org >IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ >
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2000 12:12:16 UTC