W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:56:47 -0400
Message-Id: <200009211756.NAA29481@torque.pothole.com>
To: "Steve Wang" <steve.wang@chromatix.com>
cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

I'll check into this.  It's actually from Charlie Kaufman of Iris who
should be credited...

Donald

From:  "Steve Wang" <steve.wang@chromatix.com>
Resent-Date:  Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:52:51 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Message-Id:  <200009211452.KAA09077@www19.w3.org>
Message-ID:  <001b01c023db$d6755e80$65030a0a@chromatix.com>
To:  <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
References:  <200007171914.PAA20986@torque.pothole.com>
Date:  Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:54:25 -0400
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;
	      	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C023BA.4ED11B70"

>Hi, all,
>
>In the section 6.4.2 of the current XML DSIG documentation, it says that
>the prefix is hex 30 21 30 1F 06 05 2B 0E 03 02 1A 05 00 04 14
>
>I just wonder if it should be hex 30 21 30 09 06 05 2B 0E 03 02 1A 05 00 =
>04 14, i.e.,
>the byte 1F should be 09.
>
>Thank you in advance!
>
>Steve
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2000 13:53:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT