W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

AW: Poll: Relative URIs and Strings in xmlns attributes

From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 17:04:42 +0200
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIMACDKCOPBLEJCCDCECJCLAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
My vote is for #2.

Since neither Canonical XML nor XML-Signature interpret namespace
uri values in an other way as that they are strings, I don't see
a reason to forbid the generation of a canonical version for XML
docs using relative namespace uris.

Regards, Gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gregor Karlinger
mailto://gregor.karlinger@iaik.at
http://www.iaik.at
Phone +43 316 873 5541
Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 11:04:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT