W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

WG: Poll: RSA structure

From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:39:12 +0200
To: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIMACDKCOPBLEJCCDMEJPCKAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Joseph,

as I already have written in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0370.html
I opt for 2)

Regards, Gregor
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gregor Karlinger
mailto://gregor.karlinger@iaik.at
http://www.iaik.at
Phone +43 316 873 5541
Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------


> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]Im Auftrag von Joseph M. Reagle
> Jr.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 07. September 2000 22:44
> An: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG
> Betreff: Poll: RSA structure
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/Signature/Minutes/000907-tele.html
> >* ACTION: Reagle, email poll of which option people want.
> >* ACTION: Reagle, get Brian/Barb to tweak text once resolved..
>
> Based on the summary of options provided by Merlin [1] it is
> presently clear
> that 2 OR 4 (everyone seems to agree supporting both is not good) are the
> preferred methods. My present tally is as follows:
>
> 2) B64 (C(P(ASN1(D(data))))) (PKCS#1 wrapped digest)
> a. Merlin Hugues
> b. Mark Bartel
>
> 4) B64 (OID . C(P(ASN1(D(data)))))
> a. Philip Hallam-Baker
>
> If you have an opinion on this matter (or need to correct the
> above tally),
> please make it known by close of business (eastern time) Monday.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0398.html
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Joseph Reagle Jr.
> W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
> IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 02:38:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT