- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 18:51:16 -0400
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
At 17:51 9/7/2000 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >I haven't wrapped the text because I wasn't sure what the best width >was but white space is ignored in Base64 so spaces and new lines can >be inserted withough effecting the encoded certifciates. Editorial question: were these requested? The big globs of data representing the cert chain, intermediate cert, and root cert are rather ugly and verbose for something that is optional regardless. In our efforts to keep this document from bloating all out of proportion, we don't even include an instance of a valid SignatureValue in-line (they are external and referenced), consequently in light of ~terseness I'm not keen on having these in-line. If people think it is fundamentally necessary to the understanding of this portion of the spec, we could link to them...? _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 18:51:22 UTC