W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects

From: Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:12:59 -0700
Message-ID: <FB9575840F91DC4EACEB5CD6F573A20DB8A064@red-msg-20.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "'Philip Hallam-Baker'" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Yes, the spec need to be clear on this point.  (And I agree that if a
validating client can do so it should chase redirected URIs to get the right
bucket of bits.)  


-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Hallam-Baker [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 8:48 AM
To: 'Dan Connolly'; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subject: RE: Detached signatures and HTTP Redirects

Brians point may have been that the spec needs to
make the intention clear on this point.
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2000 14:06:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:34 UTC