W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Draft Minutes of 24 August 2000 Teleconference

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 22:53:42 -0400
Message-Id: <200008250253.WAA25921@torque.pothole.com>
To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com

Actually, there I did get a comment that the example does not show
even vaguely realistic Base 64 for the certs so I'll repost with that
one fix since it seems reasonable.

The minutes should show there was consensus on the syntax questions
which are not effected by this example tweak.

Sorry,
Donald

From:  Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Message-Id:  <200008242143.RAA23599@noah.dma.isg.mot.com>
To:  w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
cc:  lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
Date:  Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:43:12 -0400

>...
>
>- KeyInfo/X509Data - there were no objections to the last version
>posted by Donald Eastlake which appears to be the consensus:
><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0318.html>
>
>...
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2000 22:50:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT