W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Canonicalization

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 08:09:47 -0400
Message-Id: <200008241209.IAA26421@torque.pothole.com>
To: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
cc: "XML" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

I suppose that it is partly the effect where computer people are
overly systematic in wordforms...  Also, I would have guessed that
"canonization" to declare some particular form to be the canonical
form, while "canonicalization" is to transform something...


From:  "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Resent-Date:  Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:46:17 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Message-Id:  <200008241146.e7OBkHG18986@www19.w3.org>
To:  "XML" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Date:  Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:46:35 +0200
Message-ID:  <NDBBIMACDKCOPBLEJCCDKEPCCJAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>

>Hi all!
>Maybe this question is kind of philosophical, but does anybody of
>you know why the term "Canonicalization" is written as it is?
>Recently I tried to find out, what it means to produce a canonical
>form of something: 
>According to the Merriam-Webster Englisch Dictionary [1] the only 
>explanation which fits is:
>  to canonize: to treat as illustrious, preeminent
>This makes sense, since the canonical form of an XML-Document is
>a prominent form of many representaions for the logical XML structure.
>But the noun for the process of canonizing something is:
>  canonization
>However, I could not find "canonicalization" or "canonicalize" in any
>dictionary I have access to.
>[1] http://www.m-w.com/
>Regards, (A completely confused) Gregor
>Gregor Karlinger
>Phone +43 316 873 5541
>Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2000 08:07:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:34 UTC