W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms

From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:15:27 +0900
Message-Id: <200008230515.OAA02510@ns.trl.ibm.com>
To: "John Boyer" <jboyer@PureEdge.com>
CC: "XML DSig" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <jboyer@csr.csc.UVic.CA>

In message "Proposed processing model for Reference and Transforms"
    on 00/08/22, "John Boyer" <jboyer@PureEdge.com> writes:
> Attached is a copy of the latest editors' copy of the XML DSig
> specification, except that I have added and deleted the text necessary to
> implement the new Reference/Transform processing model discussed in the most
> recent teleconference.

- Full XPointer in URI="" (4.3.3)
- C14n with Comments and without comments

I feel these have no other sense than the specification get
complicated and ugly.  Why is XPointer introduced now though we
can not use ranges?  The fewer optional features and rules, the
more we can achieve interoperability, I think.

TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2000 01:16:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:34 UTC