W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

RE: Errors and Questions

From: Barb Fox <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:20:12 -0700
Message-ID: <96BABA22ECEAEA45B53D08D63E1B567826F1DF@DF-SPIKE.platinum.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Cc: "XML" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "Brian LaMacchia" <bal@microsoft.com>


[Barb/Brian: I'm deferring GK13-16,20 to you.]


 > [GK13]Why key(s) and not key? How can more than
 >exacly one key be used?

I believe that might be because more than one key might be required for
trust, but not for Signature validation, so I'd agree with you. Barbara?

[Barb] Multiple declarations refer to the same key - which we state.
"Keys" should be changed to "key." 

 > [GK14]How can more than exacly one key be used?

Barbara?  [Barb]  This is an error. It should be a single key. 

 > [GK15]Here the value for exactly one key can be
 >determined!

Yes, the schema and prose are in conflict.  [Barb]  agree. 

 > [GK16]Right: minOccurs='0'  [Barb] agree


 > [GK20]Only a single certificate possible here?  [Barb]  Yes. One per
clause. 
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2000 03:26:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT