At 12:21 7/26/2000 -0400, Ed Simon wrote: >XMLSig implementors are under no obligation to try to handle >data types that do not have well-defined c14n algorithms >associated with them. To me that is outside the scope >of both the XMLSig WG and implementors. And as I said, ><Transform> elements are really intended just for converting >XML input to XML output. Additionally, under "See What you Sign" if the semantics imparted by those formats are not well represented to the users, they have serious security problems. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2000 13:24:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT