W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: samples in c14n ?

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 15:58:21 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000707155821.019e7820@localhost>
To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:29 2000-07-07 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
 >Er, it might be good to add them before last call. Typically, examples:
 >- tickle people to notice bugs or odd wording in the spec
 >- are sometimes wrong and it would be good to have the WG review them fully

Understood, however the other constraints are:
1. I've set the ball in motion (established the document and sent the
request) for this to be published as a Last Call on Monday, but I suppose I
could yank that if need be.
2. Timewise, I'd like the other XML WGs (specifically XML Core and XML
Query) to look at these and send us comments prior to our FTF meeting. I've
discussed this timing on W3C Chairs and I wanted to get XML Query a copy to
review prior to their July 25th FTF, so they can get us their comments prior
to our FTF (as well as other WGs that plan to use it). I agree that a review
with examples would be useful in debugging, but my bias is towards taking
advantage of the three week review window and these FTFs to ensure the
bigger issues are raised and resolved. We can certainly add examples when we
address any last call issues before we go to Candidate REC, but fortunately
those additions won't change the direction or dependencies that we learned
about from the Last Call, just their exposition (debugging).


_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 7 July 2000 15:59:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:10 GMT