W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2000

AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath

From: Peter Lipp <Peter.Lipp@iaik.at>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:14:02 +0200
To: "'''IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG \(E-mail\) ' ' '" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLDEHJKOODMJCNBNCGEIODIAA.Peter.Lipp@iaik.at>

> A question here: Why can't we simply exclude the entire Signature element?
That's what Gregor and I have been discussing today. I would strongly prefer
that! I'd like to know if anything spoke against it.....

Peter

application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s

Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2000 12:13:41 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Boyer: "RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath"
Previous message: John Boyer: "RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath"
In reply to: Petteri Stenius: "RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath"
Next in thread: tgindin@us.ibm.com: "RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT