W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Comments on last call draft

From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:50:40 +0900
Message-Id: <200003170850.RAA28522@ns.trl.ibm.com>
To: "'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

> <insert>
...
> </insert>
> 
> which from my point of view basically says if the XML-encoded data is
> going to go through some form of XML parsing during its processing, 
> then one really needs to do XML-aware canonicalization (eg. XML-c14n) 
> before signing it.
> 
> It seems to me what Kent is saying is in accordance with the above fragment 
> from the spec.  Kent, John, would you agree or disagree?  

This insertion is acceptable for me though I hope XML Signature
could be processed on only XML Information Set.

Anyway, remove the minimal c14n, or change requirement of the
minimal c14n: REQUIRED -> RECOMMENDED, please.

-- 
TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Friday, 17 March 2000 03:51:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT