Re: Comments on last call draft

> <insert>
...
> </insert>
> 
> which from my point of view basically says if the XML-encoded data is
> going to go through some form of XML parsing during its processing, 
> then one really needs to do XML-aware canonicalization (eg. XML-c14n) 
> before signing it.
> 
> It seems to me what Kent is saying is in accordance with the above fragment 
> from the spec.  Kent, John, would you agree or disagree?  

This insertion is acceptable for me though I hope XML Signature
could be processed on only XML Information Set.

Anyway, remove the minimal c14n, or change requirement of the
minimal c14n: REQUIRED -> RECOMMENDED, please.

-- 
TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM