W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:14:45 -0600
Message-ID: <38965DB5.D2A65C22@w3.org>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
CC: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" wrote:
> 
> I've been thining about this some more and believe we should just go
> with what all normal people think of as a URI.

Good. I think you'll be glad you did.

[...]

> I don't see the non-validating parser / absence of a DTD as that much
> of a problem

more on that separately...


-- 
Dan Connolly
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 23:17:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT