- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 08:40:09 -0400
- To: "Peter Lipp" <Peter.Lipp@iaik.at>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 07:56 2000-05-14 -0400, Peter Lipp wrote: >> Again, I *strongly* encourage Joseph and others at the W3C, as well as >> leaders in the IETF, to consider this as a W3C/IETF activity. It really >> *should not* be a Legal XML activity. But, there should be *someplace* >> where this discussion and work can take place . . . >I am not fully aware about the procedures, but it should not be too >difficult for anybody to initate a BOF at the next IETF e.g., so you could >go for it! In the W3C there are workshops, but they are usually more "costly" to start than an IETF BoF. I believe for an IETF BoF you generally have to show the area director(s) that there is a body of interest that would make scheduling the topic worthwhile. I created the xml encryption list [1] to see if that thresh-hold of interest is high enough. (Though I haven't committed to starting/devoting-time to it and their hasn't been all that much discussion.) Someone could do the same for XML cert (or I'd be happy to create a list when I get back from Europe). [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/ _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2000 08:41:13 UTC