I think we should change, and not solely for consistency reasons. Although the DSS specifies SHA-1, it would be fairly easy to use a DSA key with RIPEMD-160, and people might well call that signature algorithm "dsa-ripe". Tom Gindin "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 05/05/2000 07:22:34 PM Sent by: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> cc: Subject: DSA and RSA AlgIDs Presently, our algorithm identifiers are: http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#dsa http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#rsa-sha1 Should we move to http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#dsa-sha1 for consistence? _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Monday, 8 May 2000 10:59:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT