Christian, Thanks for your comments. [1] We've been working on the post last call draft and have most of the typos handled. The one issue that remains open for discussion is the SignatureProperty(ies) namespace. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JanMar/0160.html At 10:11 PM 3/2/00 +0100, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: >----------------------- > >In section 2.2, explanation of example [p04] > > Is: "In particular, [...] Object, SignatureProperties, or > Should be: "In particular, [...] Object, SignatureProperty, or > >(See end of section 4.3.3, example values for "Type" attribute) > >Related to this definition, another problem occurs. The 3rd "Type" >example in 4.3.3 refers to >"Type="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/xmldsig#SignatureProperty"", >although the referred ID is a Properties element within an Object >and not a Property within a Properties element. > >Suggestion: > It would be clearer to substitute all occurences of > http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#SignatureProperty > by > http://www.w3.org/2000/02/xmldsig#SignatureProperties > and let the above sentence in its current version. > >----------------------- _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 17:37:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:09 GMT