W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Comments for Transform

From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:38:44 +0900
Message-Id: <199912090838.RAA32600@ns.trl.ibm.com>
To: "John Boyer" <jboyer@uwi.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Cc: "Dave Solo" <dsolo@alum.mit.edu>

In message "RE: Comments for Transform"
    on 99/12/07, "John Boyer" <jboyer@uwi.com> writes:
> Step #3 states that the node-set will be interpreted in document order,
> which is clearly defined in the XPath specification [1].
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#dt-document-order

No.  Order in a set of attribute nodes or namespace nodes is
implementation-dependent.

In http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#dt-document-order
	....  The relative order of namespace nodes is
	implementation-dependent. The relative order of
	attribute nodes is implementation-dependent. Reverse
	document order is the reverse of document order.

-- 
TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Thursday, 9 December 1999 10:37:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT