W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT!

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:45:20 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991115144520.00b41760@localhost>
To: webreq@w3.org
Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "XML Syntax WG" <w3c-xml-syntax-wg@w3.org>
Hugo,

Could you please publish [1]? Tim pointed out that the version that was
published last week was based on a September draft, and that he had prepared
an October draft as well. It html validates and checklinks.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xml-c14n-19991115 

At 09:33 99/11/15 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
 >At 04:42 PM 11/9/99 -0500, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. wrote:
 >>http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xml-c14n-19991109 
 >
 >I finally got around to looking at this, and IT'S THE WRONG DRAFT.
 >
 >The latest draft, incorporating changes and feedback and recovering
 >from the version-lossage problem, quoting from my email of Oct. 3,is
 >
 >The new version is at
 >
 >  http://www.textuality.com/xml/c14n-19991003.html
 >
 >The diffs from the previous version are at
 >
 >  http://www.textuality.com/xml/diffs.txt
 >
 >Joseph, I think you need to fix this up quickly. -Tim
 >

_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 15 November 1999 14:45:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT