- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 11:17:26 -0500
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 11:10 99/10/29 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >> 99-October-28 >> Chairs: Donald Eastlake and Joseph Reagle >> Note Taker: Joseph Reagle [[4]ascii] Don, thanks for the comments, I've inserted them into the minutes. >Wouldn't this be > ><Object >Type="http://www.w3.org/1999/10/signature-core/signatureproperties"> > <Properties> > <Property Target="ID of Signature" > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/10/signature-core/time"> > <Date>...</Date> > <Time>...</Time> > ... > </Property> > </Properties> ></Object> > >or the like? Yes, and I added the comment is the reason that we've done this in object (where people can include whatever semantics they want) is that the element Properties is a particular type of object (that we defined) for semantics about the signature itself. We might be able to do something snazzy with schema such that Properties is a type of object, or we might define it such that there is only one property in an object, if you want multiple properties, you should have multiple objects. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 1 November 1999 11:17:37 UTC