W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Location=""

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:01:13 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: "W3c-Ietf-Xmldsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 23:29 99/10/28 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
 >I have no problem with changing the spec to say that if the specification
 >of Location is omitted, the signature is over the first Object in
 >instead of being application dependent, if the WG wants that.  This seems
 >better than varying from the URI spec for the null URI.

I agree that we should not vary from the URI spec, but I (among others) want
the meaning to remain the same: context (not first object.)

Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 29 October 1999 10:01:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:32 UTC