W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Location=""

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:01:13 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991029100113.009e0100@localhost>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: "W3c-Ietf-Xmldsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 23:29 99/10/28 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
 >I have no problem with changing the spec to say that if the specification
 >of Location is omitted, the signature is over the first Object in
Signature,
 >instead of being application dependent, if the WG wants that.  This seems
much
 >better than varying from the URI spec for the null URI.

I agree that we should not vary from the URI spec, but I (among others) want
the meaning to remain the same: context (not first object.)


_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
Policy Analyst           mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 29 October 1999 10:01:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT