W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: draft resulting from 990930 call

From: <david.solo@citicorp.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 09:18:40 -0400
Message-Id: <H0000cc404665cd9@MHS>
TO: gwhitehead@signio.com, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Greg,

There are actually two defaults, one for canonicalizing SignedInfo, and one for 
canonicalizing an Object.  Each of these will have a default specified (which 
may or may not be the same - TBD).  We'll add the language to 4.1 for the 
SignedInfo default.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gwhitehead [mailto:gwhitehead@signio.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 8:39 PM
> To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig
> Cc: gwhitehead
> Subject: RE: draft resulting from 990930 call
> 
> 
> >4.3.3 Transformations
> 
> Are transformations to be applied in the order specified?
> 
> >If the Transformations element is omitted,
> >the only operation performed is the default
> >c14n algorithm (null or identity).
> 
> Am I correct in reading this as "the spec will eventually 
> define a default
> c14n algorithm, which will be either null or identity"?
> 
> I assume this same default will apply to SignedInfo when its 
> c14nAlg is
> omitted? If so, language should be added to sec 4.0 or 4.1.
> 
> -Greg
> 
> --
> Greg Whitehead
> Chief Scientist
> Signio, Inc.
> 1600 Bridge Parkway, Suite 201
> Redwood City, CA  94065
> 650-622-2250
> 650-622-2201 (fax)
> gwhitehead@signio.com
> http://www.signio.com
> 


Received on Tuesday, 5 October 1999 09:19:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:08 GMT