- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 17:47:53 -0400
- To: "Barb Fox (Exchange)" <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Cc: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 14:44 99/10/01 -0700, Barb Fox (Exchange) wrote: >Abstracts usually include the following text: > >The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", > "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this > document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. Right, so we are missing "mandatory", we we might as well change to REQUIRED. I'll change this in the spec. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 1 October 1999 17:47:54 UTC