W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 1999

RE: Some possible rqmt/design points

From: Phillip M Hallam-Baker <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 15:23:53 -0400
To: <rdbrown@globeset.com>, <david.solo@citicorp.com>
Cc: "'IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001beb82d$c5863a60$6e07a8c0@pbaker-pc.verisign.com>
> Phil,
> 
> > OK Dave, I accept the point that the interpretation of the work is
> > performed by the recipient. I don't however accept that this means
> > that the sender should not have the means to fully express their
> > original intentions.
> 
> It should a matter of the XML body to explicit the intention. The body of
> the document represents the assertion. The signature attests its
> authenticity.

What if the entity is a notary public?

I certainly don't want to vet documents before stamping them.
I may well not want to see the document itself to create the 
signature.

But I do want to incorporate disclaimers.


		Phill
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 1999 15:23:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:06 GMT