RE: Some possible rqmt/design points

> Phil,
> 
> > OK Dave, I accept the point that the interpretation of the work is
> > performed by the recipient. I don't however accept that this means
> > that the sender should not have the means to fully express their
> > original intentions.
> 
> It should a matter of the XML body to explicit the intention. The body of
> the document represents the assertion. The signature attests its
> authenticity.

What if the entity is a notary public?

I certainly don't want to vet documents before stamping them.
I may well not want to see the document itself to create the 
signature.

But I do want to incorporate disclaimers.


		Phill