At 09:13 AM 6/13/99 -0700, TSG - Meridianus wrote: >We should also note the DRI payments group too and Todd Vincent's XML Court >Projects. My intent was not to point out related activities, but to point out other specific requirements documents as examples of good/interesting RDs: the scope, how they do it, etc. It now reads: >The following documents are not necessarily related to XML Signature, but are >interesting examples of other WG requirements documents. However, recalling identified activities is a good idea, and I added a section, taken from the charter with Todd's proposal of XML-Legal as the TBD: Coordination 1. The XML Signature specification should meet the requirements of the following applications: Internet Open Trading Protocol v2.0 [Charter] 2. Legal XML [List] 3. Financial Services Mark Up Language v2.0 [Charter] The XML Signature specification must be reviewed by the following communities: 1. XML Syntax WG [Charter] 2. XML Linking WG [Charter] 3. XML Schema WG [Charter] 4. Metadata CG [Charter] _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-DSig Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Monday, 14 June 1999 11:06:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:06 GMT