- From: Jon Radoff <jradoff@novalink.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 17:58:53 -0700
- To: -=jack=- <jack@twaxx.twaxx.com>
- CC: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, "Henry Sanders (Exchange)" <henrysa@exchange.microsoft.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> > I too am coming to the conclusion that ACLs need to be part of DAV, I will > take it upon myself to put out a proposal by the end of next week. > ------------------------ > Yes, I'm of the opinion that if management and administration are the > goal of this, then move, copy, security issues and access control are > all necessary to provide a really usable/comprehensive infrastructure... > I'm not so sure that ACLs should be included. I think that the issues surrounding permissions on a network are too complex -- current ACL infrastructures are already falling short. I think that permission control on the network should be addressed in a separate context. Jon
Received on Thursday, 1 May 1997 09:37:35 UTC