Re: Lock timeouts revisited

To: ejw@ics.uci.edu
Subject: Re: Lock timeouts revisited
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 20:42:29 PDT
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
From w3c-dist-auth-request@www10.w3.org Sun Sep 29 23: 42:53 1996
In-reply-to: <ae71ece8000210047762@[128.59.24.33]> (message from Jim Whitehead on Fri, 27 Sep 1996 13:57:12 PDT)
Message-Id: <96Sep29.204229pdt."2759"@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
X-List-URL: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/
X-See-Also: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/authoring

There are so many ways that different systems or configurations
accomplish lock resolution that it would be a serious mistake to bind
just one of them into the protocol. So I'm not sure what your message
is proposing.

Larry

References:

Lock timeouts revisited

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>

Prev: Re: Possibly Naive Question -Reply
Next: RE: Lock timeouts revisited
Index: Message index of w3c-dist-auth@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of w3c-dist-auth@w3.org mailing list