- From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:07:14 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On 11/15/2016 03:59 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2016-11-15 21:56, Ken Murchison wrote: > >> Just to clarify, which methods do you think need to have additional >> references? PROPFIND, REPORT, and PROPPATCH because we alter the >> responses for return=minimal? Also keep in mind the the server is >> always free to ignore the preference if it so chooses. > > Those, plus MKCOL, right? Hmm. I'm not sure we alter anything specified by 4918 or 5689 for MKCOL. Maybe there is an argument that we alter the MKCALENDAR response. I do wonder why 5689 isn't listed as a reference for MKCOL since it adds a request body. -- Kenneth Murchison Principal Systems Software Engineer Carnegie Mellon University
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:07:45 UTC