W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09

From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:07:14 -0500
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9b021292-f697-fac9-c79e-495480435e27@andrew.cmu.edu>

On 11/15/2016 03:59 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2016-11-15 21:56, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Just to clarify, which methods do you think need to have additional
>> references?  PROPFIND, REPORT, and PROPPATCH because we alter the
>> responses for return=minimal?  Also keep in mind the the server is
>> always free to ignore the preference if it so chooses.
> Those, plus MKCOL, right?

Hmm.  I'm not sure we alter anything specified by 4918 or 5689 for 
MKCOL.  Maybe there is an argument that we alter the MKCALENDAR response.

I do wonder why 5689 isn't listed as a reference for MKCOL since it adds 
a request body.

Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:07:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:07:46 UTC