Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-05.txt

On 2013-09-19 17:34, Ken Murchison wrote:
> ...
>> It would be good to understand whether there indeed was a library
>> broken by this (and whether it's possible to fix it), or just some
>> kind of fear.
>
> Can you confirm that the following would be a valid multistatus
> response?  I think we had some question on that.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <D:multistatus xmlns:D="DAV:">
>    <D:response>
>      <D:href>/container/</D:href>
>      <D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
>    </D:response>
> </D:multistatus>


It appears so; the DTD for <response> is:

<!ELEMENT response (href, ((href*, status)|(propstat+)),
                     error?, responsedescription? , location?) >

That being said: if I client actually attempts DTD validation on 
responses it will have lots of other problems :-).

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 15:46:22 UTC